Coding Agent Leaderboard

How coding agents perform on real software-engineering tasks, with API cost and runtime per task

Coding Agent Index v1.5Snapshot: 2026-10-22
Sort
#Agent / modelIndexCost / taskTime / task
1
Claude Code
68.4%Best$14.191.5h
2
Devin Fusion CLI
68.2%$9.0255m
3
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (max)
68.0%—28.8m
4
Claude Code
66.0%$13.041.1h
5
Antigravity CLI
63.8%$5.8434.5m
6
Muse Code
63.7%$8.0422.4m
7
Claude Code
62.2%$12.3934.8m
8
Claude Code
61.7%$11.421h
9
Codex
61.6%$7.5029.4m
10
Devin Fusion CLI
61.5%$8.0051.1m
11
Codex
60.1%$1.5524.4m
12
GitHub Copilot
Copilot Fusion (max)
59.9%$5.5936.1m
13
Claude Code
59.3%$13.301.3h
14
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
58.9%—34.9m
15
Claude Code
57.6%$11.5335.3m
16
Grok Build
56.3%$8.8239.2m
17
Codex
54.7%$7.0424.8m
18
Codex
54.1%$1.5023.7m
19
Opencode
53.6%$4.3748.1m
20
Antigravity CLI
53.2%$11.7334.7m
21
Muse Code
52.0%$8.0524.5m
22
Kimi Code CLI
51.9%$5.051h
23
Opencode
48.9%$5.2356.2m
24
Mistral Vibe
48.3%$1.2648.4m
25
Codex
48.2%$0.6916.4m
26
Grok Build
46.6%$9.4835.8m
27
DeepSeek Harness
46.3%$0.3021.4m
28
Kimi Code CLI
41.4%$5.171h
29
Muse Code
41.2%$3.3325.2m
30
Claude Code
36.8%$2.801.5h
31
Mirror
27.7%—42.4m
32
Mirror
20.5%$0.3238.7m

How the index is built

Each agent runs three attempts per task across three suites — DeepSWE v1.1 (113 software-engineering tasks), Terminal-Bench 4.0 (66 terminal tasks) and SWE-Atlas-QnA (124 technical Q&A tasks) — scored as pass@1. The index is their equal-weight average. Cost is measured token usage × provider token prices, not subscription plans.