AI Agent and Coding Agent Plans Compared
Compare task-oriented AI agent plans such as Devin, Claude Code, Codex, Replit Agent, Manus and Genspark. The useful comparison is not just monthly price. It is concurrency, long-running work, browser access, code execution, filesystem access and human approval flow.
Agent plans should be compared by capability
Agent products sell completed work, not just tokens. V1 adds the category and surfaces; curated data and scrapers can follow without disturbing API pricing.
Coding Agents
IDE, CLI, repo indexing, terminal execution, PR edits and background tasks for Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, Claude Code, Codex and Replit Agent.
Autonomous Agents
Agents that browse, plan, call tools and ask for approval when needed. Useful for Devin, Manus, Genspark and ChatGPT Agent style products.
Workflow Agents
Automation agents for ops, sales, research and internal workflows. The comparison is integrations, triggers, logs, permissions and handoff.
Priority products
4Cognition
Devin
Autonomous software engineering agent. Track task capacity, concurrency and approval flow.
Anthropic
Claude Code
CLI coding agent. The plan relationship with Claude Pro / Max / Team Premium must be explicit.
OpenAI
OpenAI Codex
Coding agent bundled with paid ChatGPT tiers and developer workflows.
Manus
Manus
General-purpose task agent. Track credits, browser, files and long-running work.
Catalog tracker
V1 tracks public products, units and capabilities. Verified exact prices will move into plans and usage_prices.
Fields to track
Why this is its own vertical
Agent plans are sold by tasks, credits, compute hours or seats. Folding them into chatbot subscriptions would hide the thing buyers actually compare.